I cant seem to find this documented anywhere. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. Can I assume that this article applies only to full frame & not to micro four thirds? Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ??
135mm f2 vs 200 f2.8 primes? - Beginning Deep Sky Imaging - Cloudy Nights Nice article for beginners.It's all in the eyes of the beholder. (Suggesting that diffraction limiting is only part of the story with lens softness at tiny apertures.). (And cost less too). It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. See the full-size version on Astrobin. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. Photography is art and technology, the latter serving the first.Photography is not something arty with a lot of gadgetry. I would love to see his test images. The Rokinon website lists this lens as being useful for portraiture photography, and most telephoto applications. Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. Could use a few updates. My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. This is a very popular lens, and I am sure there are a ton of lens test reports for it available online. Neutral yet very nice colours. Otherwise I might not achieve focus?
It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. f/2! Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? I have found myself shooting wide open almost all the time. Fit and finish are first-rate as well, with very smooth manual focus operation, and very fast autofocus on the camera. Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. 2 Dielectric Diagonals. It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) Im a newbie at astro.. and photography in general really! With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens. For DPReview, it's also an opportunity for a good old-fashioned camera fight. I guess thats where practice will come in handy. Thanks! Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. Colour and contrast is great. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. Touching the telescope, even ever so slightly, will introduce vibrations which will ruin the photograph. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO Super sharp from f2. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. I disagree. Yes there's bokeh. Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. In between interviews with executives of the major companies, Dale Baskin took to the show floor to bring you this report. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. wew.. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. Holiday Savings $50 . I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. Jordan has a simple fix camera manufacturers could implement to improve their video autofocus. $581.00 for 7 days. It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! Some people do not like this and consider Bokeh to refer only to the rendering of out of focus points of light. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. Big F-value.Light. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 4th, 2006 If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! Interesting. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? Fast. I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Great reach for street shots. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. This is one of the sharpest lens i've ever owned. I'll walk you through all this inc. This lens provides all of these requirements. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. p.s. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. But will live with it as it provides good protection of the front element. My copy is 12-years-old and still delivers at over 75 weddings a year. I like fast lenses, and my Nikkor 105DC is my favourite. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. It disagrees completely with the definition that you give! The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. 135mm and 200mm lenses are suitable for wide angle star-field views, and comet and asteroid hunting, while 300mm lenses serve very well for the Andromeda galaxy, large emission nebulae, open clusters, and even larger globular clusters. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. No telephoto lens can be used with cameras modified by the removal of the internal UV/IR cut filter and anti-aliasing filter. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. Well, for me.
Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) - B&H Photo This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. $399 00. It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible.
Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo It just doesn't get any better than this! But she might as well be in front of a green screen. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. Manually focusing a lens for astrophotography is nothing new, but the manual aperture ring adjustments may feel a little strange at first. Unfortunately it is not manufactured in a multicoated version, and produces prominent internal reflection artifacts on very bright stars. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. My questions, for deep sky pics, should I get the 135mm lens or the RedCat 51 APO 250mm f/4.9 which you mentioned here as well? Latter looks quite professional.. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image.